Skip to main content
Glama
carbon-nanotubes-rag-mcp

carbon-nanotubes-rag-mcp

by slastrzelec

Related Servers

Alternatives to carbon-nanotubes-rag-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding and research agents to run paid, cited deep research on AI infrastructure, MCP, and security topics via remote MCP tools, with query-tied excerpt packs and uncited or failed calls billed at $0.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to search, fetch, and read legal open-access scientific papers with provenance tracking through a stable MCP tool contract.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access corporate project and employee workload data via MCP, offering read-only tools, resources, and prompts, and highlighting prompt injection risks.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Paid remote MCP endpoint for AI SDK data queries, offering structured JSON tools, token-based access, usage receipts, and audit-ready workflow evidence.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to run hybrid retrieval, build token-budgeted attributed context packs, answer questions with citation and groundedness-gated release, explore temporal graph entities, evaluate claim support, and ingest screened, embedded documents through typed MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An authenticated MCP gateway that ingests documents and orchestrates hundreds of tools via progressive discovery, keeping context cost constant. It provides per-user RAG over ingested documents and a 116-tool registry that the model navigates through search, describe, and invoke tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: listing corpus documents, retrieving relevant passages, and generating an answer. The descriptions explicitly distinguish search_papers from ask_papers by cost and output type, leaving little room for misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_papers, search_papers, ask_papers. The shared noun suffix reinforces the common domain while the verbs clearly differentiate actions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a RAG server focused on corpus listing, retrieval, and question answering. Each tool serves a distinct stage of the workflow, with no redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core RAG lifecycle: inspect the corpus, retrieve evidence, and obtain grounded answers. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool to fetch a full paper or richer metadata, but the stated purpose is well served.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing