carbon-nanotubes-rag-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to carbon-nanotubes-rag-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding and research agents to run paid, cited deep research on AI infrastructure, MCP, and security topics via remote MCP tools, with query-tied excerpt packs and uncited or failed calls billed at $0.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to search, fetch, and read legal open-access scientific papers with provenance tracking through a stable MCP tool contract.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLMs to access corporate project and employee workload data via MCP, offering read-only tools, resources, and prompts, and highlighting prompt injection risks.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePaid remote MCP endpoint for AI SDK data queries, offering structured JSON tools, token-based access, usage receipts, and audit-ready workflow evidence.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to run hybrid retrieval, build token-budgeted attributed context packs, answer questions with citation and groundedness-gated release, explore temporal graph entities, evaluate claim support, and ingest screened, embedded documents through typed MCP tools.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn authenticated MCP gateway that ingests documents and orchestrates hundreds of tools via progressive discovery, keeping context cost constant. It provides per-user RAG over ingested documents and a 116-tool registry that the model navigates through search, describe, and invoke tools.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: listing corpus documents, retrieving relevant passages, and generating an answer. The descriptions explicitly distinguish search_papers from ask_papers by cost and output type, leaving little room for misselection.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_papers, search_papers, ask_papers. The shared noun suffix reinforces the common domain while the verbs clearly differentiate actions.
Three tools is well-scoped for a RAG server focused on corpus listing, retrieval, and question answering. Each tool serves a distinct stage of the workflow, with no redundant or filler tools.
The surface covers the core RAG lifecycle: inspect the corpus, retrieve evidence, and obtain grounded answers. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool to fetch a full paper or richer metadata, but the stated purpose is well served.