delete_multiple_nodes
Batch delete multiple Figma nodes with a single command to clean up design files.
Instructions
Delete multiple nodes from Figma at once
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeIds | Yes | Array of node IDs to delete |
Batch delete multiple Figma nodes with a single command to clean up design files.
Delete multiple nodes from Figma at once
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeIds | Yes | Array of node IDs to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states 'delete' implying mutation, but doesn't disclose potential side effects, permissions, or error behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, efficient sentence with no filler. Front-loaded and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimally adequate given a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema. Lacks behavioral context but not severely deficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already describes the parameter clearly. Description adds no additional semantic value. Baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it deletes multiple nodes, distinguishing from the sibling delete_node for single node. However, it lacks specificity about permanence or scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied by the name and description (multiple vs single), but no explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/skulidropek/figma-tunnel-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server