vikunja-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to vikunja-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA task management MCP server that provides tools to create, list, complete, and delete tasks using pluggable storage backends. It enables users to interact with their task lists through natural language using MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that wraps a personal task manager REST API, enabling Claude to read and manage tasks via tools like get_tasks and add_task.7 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server exposing Zentra's Task API as tools for Claude, enabling task creation, listing, and moving via natural language from any project.3-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn OAuth-authenticated MCP server that bridges Claude AI with a task management system, allowing users to list, create, and update tasks through natural language commands.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that wraps the Taskwarrior CLI to allow AI assistants to create, query, modify, and manage tasks directly from agentic coding tools.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with the Taskwarrior command-line task management tool. It allows users to list, create, modify, and organize tasks using projects, tags, and annotations through natural language.132MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose (create, read, update, complete, reopen, list, connect) with no overlap. Descriptions clarify ambiguous fields like task_id vs index, further aiding agent selection.
All tool names follow a strict verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_task, get_task, update_task) using lowercase with underscores. No deviations or mixed conventions.
Seven tools is appropriate for a task management server, covering creation, retrieval, update, completion, reopening, listing, and connection verification. Neither too sparse nor bloated.
Core task lifecycle (CRUD plus complete/reopen) is covered, and the connection check is a helpful addition. Missing a dedicated delete tool is a minor gap, but agents can work around it via updates if a soft-delete field exists.