A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI coding agents to visually interact with frontend apps by taking screenshots, clicking elements, reading console logs, and performing visual diffs.
0
3
MIT
Skippr Extension MCP Server
by skippr-hq
Related Servers
Alternatives to Skippr Extension MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceUnleashes LLM-powered agents to autonomously execute and debug web apps directly in your code editor, with features like webapp navigation, network traffic capture, and console error collection.21,240Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to debug frontend applications by providing direct access to browser DevTools, React state, DOM inspection, and runtime debugging capabilities. Bridges the gap between AI and complex web applications for autonomous debugging and issue resolution.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI tools to interact with browsers for enhanced frontend development, providing context to LLMs through tools like API call analysis, screenshots, element selection, and documentation ingestion.9910-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceBridges AI coding agents with the browser to provide visual debugging, real-time error capture, screenshot capabilities, DOM inspection, and interactive wireframing through a reverse proxy with injected developer tools.2821Apache 2.0
MatterAI MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables code reviews, implementation planning, and pull request generation for AI agents in IDEs like Cursor and Windsurf.1MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 11 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: extension server management, issue/project listing, and issue verification. No two tools overlap in functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent 'skippr_verb_noun' pattern with clear action and target (e.g., skippr_list_issues, skippr_disconnect_extension). No mixing of styles.
Tool Count4/5
11 tools is reasonable for a server that handles both extension communication and issue management. Slightly on the higher side but well-organized.
Completeness3/5
Covers extension lifecycle well (connect, disconnect, list, notify, restart) and provides issue listing and verification, but lacks issue creation, update, or deletion, leaving workflow gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessSyncing