get_skill_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations; description does not explicitly state read-only nature or any side effects, though 'get' implies non-destructive. Lacks disclosure of permissions, rate limits, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, focused sentence with no unnecessary words. Every part contributes to understanding the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should detail return format; it does not. Also missing error handling info. Despite having only 2 params, the description is insufficient for an agent to fully understand the response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; both parameters have descriptions. Description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema provides (e.g., 'include_content' is already described). Baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool gets detailed information about a specific skill, listing specific aspects (evaluation, pros/cons, optional content). Distinguishes from sibling tools like search_skills (searching) and install_skill (installation).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage: when needing detailed info on a specific skill. No explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives provided among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.