yougile-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to yougile-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for YouGile project management. Provides 57 tools covering 100% of the YouGile API v2, enabling AI agents to manage projects, boards, tasks, and chat directly through natural language.5734 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for YouGile project management. Provides 57 tools covering 100% of YouGile API v2, enabling natural language management of projects, boards, columns, tasks, chats, users, and more.5734 npm10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates with YouGile to allow AI assistants to create, update, and manage projects, tasks, and team members via the MCP protocol.12-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn unofficial, security-focused MCP server for YouGile REST API, providing policy-controlled tools with read-only defaults and optional direct-write profiles.4 npm5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade Model Context Protocol server for YouGile that lets AI agents read and manage projects, boards, tasks, employees, and more.444 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for is.team, enabling AI agents to interact with project boards, tasks, cards, sprints, integrations, and real-time notifications.1008 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource-action pair: auth setup, companies, projects, boards, columns, employees, tasks, and task chat. There is no meaningful overlap even within the auth cluster because each tool handles a different step or data source.
The yg_ prefix and the general resource_action pattern are consistently used, and plural list verbs are separated from singular create/get/update verbs. Minor deviations such as yg_setup, yg_auth_status, and yg_auth_companies (which lacks an explicit verb) keep it from being a perfect 5.
Seventeen tools is reasonable for a project management MCP server, covering authentication, projects, boards, columns, employees, tasks, and comments. The count feels intentional rather than bloated, and every tool has a clear role in the workflow.
The task lifecycle is well covered with list/get/create/update plus chat and comments, and project/board/column creation supports the hierarchy. Missing update/delete operations for projects, boards, and columns are minor gaps for a tool set primarily aimed at task monitoring and management.