Skip to main content
Glama
sker65

TestRail MCP Server

by sker65

Related Servers

Alternatives to TestRail MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-native Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for TestRail. Lets Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and other AI assistants browse projects, create and update test cases, kick off test runs, and record results through natural-language conversation — with strongly-typed tool schemas and per-project custom field validation that helps LLMs generate valid TestRail requests on the first try.
      28
      1,082 npm
      39
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for TestRail that enables AI agents to manage test cases, runs, and results, plus a bundled skill to convert Jira tickets into TestRail test cases.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Redmine that provides comprehensive access to the Redmine REST API, enabling users to operate Redmine from MCP clients such as Claude Desktop.
      90
      9 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource (case, dataset, project, run, result) and action (add, get, update, delete). No overlapping purposes; an agent can easily distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent `verb_noun` pattern with underscores (e.g., add_case, get_projects). No mixing of conventions like camelCase or inconsistent verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is on the higher side but still reasonable for a comprehensive test management API covering projects, cases, runs, results, and datasets. Slightly more than ideal but each tool serves a clear purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers basic CRUD for projects, cases, runs, and datasets, but lacks operations for suites, sections, and updating results. Notable gaps like missing `update_result` and suite management limit completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues