wpscan-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to wpscan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying MITRE's Common Weakness Enumeration database for vulnerability information, supporting CWE lookup, search, taxonomy navigation, and relationship mapping through MCP.97MIT

PatrowlIntelMCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes PatrowlIntel vulnerability intelligence (CVEs, EPSS, CISA KEV, public exploits, trending attacks) via MCP tools like search_cves, get_cve, and list_trending_attacks.32MIT
scanmalware-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceWraps the ScanMalware.com API to enable phishing triage, malware scanning, and certificate inspection through natural language, allowing users to submit scans, retrieve results, and analyze threats via MCP tools.Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with WordPress sites through the WordPress REST API, dynamically exposing all routes as MCP tools for content management and site configuration.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching the NIST NVD for CVEs, retrieving full CVE details, checking software for known vulnerabilities, and searching the CPE database.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with multiple WordPress sites through a proxy that connects to the MCP Expose Abilities plugin. Allows discovering and executing WordPress abilities across configured sites with secure authentication.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource: core WordPress vulnerabilities, specific vulnerability by ID, plugin vulnerabilities, and theme vulnerabilities. There is no overlap, and agents can easily distinguish which tool to use.
All tools share the 'wpscan_' prefix, but the naming patterns vary slightly: three use object_lookup (core, plugin, theme) while one uses lookup_vuln. This is a minor inconsistency but still readable and understandable.
With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for querying WordPress vulnerabilities. Each tool covers a key area (core, plugins, themes, individual vulnerabilities), and the count is appropriate for the domain without unnecessary bloat.
The tools cover the main vulnerability lookup operations for WordPress. However, a search or list-all tool is missing, which could limit agents needing to browse vulnerabilities without a specific ID or slug. This is a minor gap.