Skip to main content
Glama
sjinks

wpscan-mcp

by sjinks

Related Servers

Alternatives to wpscan-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to browse vendors and products, retrieve vulnerabilities by vendor/product or CVE ID, fetch the latest CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE details, and check database update status via MCP tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to browse vendors and products, retrieve vulnerabilities by vendor/product or CVE ID, fetch the latest updated CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE expansions, and check current database information. It provides these capabilities through MCP tools for use in compatible clients.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to retrieve vendors, products, product-specific vulnerabilities, specific CVE IDs, recently updated CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE expansions, and database update information. It supports natural-language access to CVE data through MCP clients.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying the CVE-Search API to browse vendors, list products for a vendor, retrieve vulnerabilities for a vendor and product, fetch individual CVE records, get the latest CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE expansions, and inspect current database version information. This gives MCP clients direct, structured access to public vulnerability data.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource: core WordPress vulnerabilities, specific vulnerability by ID, plugin vulnerabilities, and theme vulnerabilities. There is no overlap, and agents can easily distinguish which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'wpscan_' prefix, but the naming patterns vary slightly: three use object_lookup (core, plugin, theme) while one uses lookup_vuln. This is a minor inconsistency but still readable and understandable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for querying WordPress vulnerabilities. Each tool covers a key area (core, plugins, themes, individual vulnerabilities), and the count is appropriate for the domain without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the main vulnerability lookup operations for WordPress. However, a search or list-all tool is missing, which could limit agents needing to browse vulnerabilities without a specific ID or slug. This is a minor gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues