Skip to main content
Glama
sjgod1427

PaperPilot

by sjgod1427
README.md
# PaperPilot

An MCP server that turns a research folder — code, data, figures, notes — into a compiled, submission-ready academic paper. Runs entirely on your machine; nothing is ever uploaded.

**Website:** [sjgod1427.github.io/PaperPilot](https://sjgod1427.github.io/PaperPilot/)
**Download:** [Latest release](https://github.com/sjgod1427/PaperPilot/releases/latest)

## What it does

Point PaperPilot at a research folder and it runs a five-stage pipeline:

1. **Screening** — checks the research for issues that would sink a submission (test-set leakage, statistical-validity problems, illegible figures, cross-file numeric mismatches) before writing a word.
2. **Venue resolution** — figures out the target venue's real formatting rules and page limits, or helps you pick one.
3. **Structure & drafting** — writes the paper into a real LaTeX template, filling every page it's allowed to.
4. **Humanization** — rewrites the draft for plain, direct academic prose.
5. **Final QA** — checks the compiled paper against the source material for hallucinated claims before calling it done.

## Using it

Download `PaperPilot.exe` from the [latest release](https://github.com/sjgod1427/PaperPilot/releases/latest) and run it — see [INSTALL.md](INSTALL.md) for the full setup for Claude Desktop, claude.ai, or Claude Code. The [website](https://sjgod1427.github.io/PaperPilot/) walks through the same steps interactively, including a live connection checker.

## Repository layout

- `src/paper_writing_pipeline/` — the MCP server (Python, `uv`-managed).
- `website/` — the marketing/distribution site (Next.js, static export, deployed to GitHub Pages via `.github/workflows/deploy-website.yml`).
- `tests/` — Python test suite (`uv run pytest`).

## Development

Python side:
```bash
uv sync
uv run pytest -q
```

Website:
```bash
cd website
npm install
npm run dev
```

TDQS

C2.7/5.0

Scored across 21 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Several file-related tools overlap in purpose: read_file, read_project_file, and read_resource, as well as write_file, write_project_file, and write_resource, have similar semantics and only descriptive context separates them. The prompt and template tools are more clearly distinct.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools use snake_case and many follow verb_noun (e.g., list_directory, read_file, write_resource), but several pipeline prompt tools are bare noun phrases (screening_prompt, venue_resolution_prompt, structure_drafting_prompt, humanization_prompt, final_qa_prompt), breaking the consistent action-oriented pattern.

Tool Count3/5

With 21 tools, the surface falls in the 16-25 'heavy' range. The count is inflated by exposing each pipeline stage prompt as a separate tool rather than one parameterized prompt tool, though the tools are still coherent for the server's purpose.

Completeness3/5

The toolset covers file, template, rendering, and pipeline handoff operations well, but notable lifecycle operations are missing: no delete/removal for project files, templates, or resources, and template management is limited to listing, getting, and adding.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues