Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
SiteVerdict

SiteVerdict

Official
by siteverdict
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to SiteVerdict

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Bannerproof

      Bannerproofofficial

      bannerproof
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run EU cookie-consent audits on public websites, checking pre-consent trackers, banner rejection behavior, Consent Mode v2, IAB TCF, GPC, undisclosed cookies, and third-party embeds, with findings, evidence, fixes, and legal references.
      MIT

    • Specularis AI Visibility Audit

      AdevAarons
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Runs AI visibility (GEO/AEO) audits on websites, checking AI crawler access, schema markup, llms.txt, and content signals, with optional full PDF report.
      MIT
    • Seonix SEO MCP

      Seonix SEO MCPofficial

      seonix-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets any AI agent audit any website for SEO, GEO/AEO, and speed problems, reporting issues and recommendations without modifying the site.
      4
      MIT

    • geo-optimizer

      skywalkerqqq
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing websites for AI/LLM readiness and generating fixes such as robots.txt rules, llms.txt, JSON-LD schema, and meta tags, plus checking brand and domain citations through natural language.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The audit tools target clearly distinct concerns (consent, speed, accessibility, email/DNS, AI search, tech stack, monitoring, content extraction), and full_website_audit is explicitly positioned as an aggregate. The main ambiguity is between get_audit_results and get_run_results, which both fetch async Apify run status/results and may be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tool names use snake_case verb_noun patterns (audit_..., check_..., detect_..., monitor_..., fetch_...). The main deviation is full_website_audit, which is a noun phrase rather than a verb-led action name, and there are some verb synonyms (audit/check/scan) that are still readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools are well-scoped for a multi-audit website analysis server. Each tool maps to a meaningful capability, with only minor redundancy in the two result-fetching tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a broad website-audit lifecycle: consent/tracking, performance, accessibility, domain/email health, AI-search readiness, tech detection, change monitoring, and content extraction, with async result retrieval. Minor gaps remain around a dedicated general SEO/content audit or broken-link checker, though related checks are partially covered elsewhere.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources