Skip to main content
Glama
sitelint

SiteLint Auditor MCP

Official
by sitelint
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to SiteLint Auditor MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sage-audit

      tmolavi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to audit URLs or raw HTML for SEO, AEO, and GEO performance, generate llms.txt manifests, and check the tool version via MCP tools.
      1
      MIT

    • SiteProbe MCP Server

      tmolavi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes website auditing, finding retrieval, and safe fix application as MCP tools so AI agents can diagnose and remediate SEO, accessibility, and technical web issues.
      MIT

    • mcp-seo

      g-battaglia
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive SEO audits on web pages, including meta tags, headings, links, images, performance, and more, via a CLI or MCP server.
      18
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-a11y-tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with web accessibility analysis tools via MCP, enabling checks for alt text, heading hierarchy, color contrast, ARIA validation, and form accessibility.
      40 npm
      MIT

    • mya11yreport-mcp

      mya11yreport
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform real accessibility audits by controlling a browser, running axe-core scans, reviewing page structure, images, tab order, and WCAG 2.2 color contrast, all over MCP with local session logging.
      21
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    audit_url and audit_html are clearly distinct by input type, but check_wcag_criterion overlaps with audit_url when filtering to a single criterion. The descriptions help differentiate them by emphasizing speed and a single-criterion focus, but minor ambiguity remains.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (audit_url, audit_html, check_wcag_criterion). The switch from 'audit' to 'check' is a slight inconsistency but still logical, as checking a single criterion differs from running a full audit.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 3 tools, the set is tightly scoped for a specialized auditor server. Each tool serves a distinct, necessary function—URL auditing, HTML snippet auditing, and focused WCAG criterion checks—without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core auditing workflows are covered: auditing a live URL, auditing raw HTML, and checking a specific WCAG criterion. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for retrieving historical audits or comparing results, but these do not block primary usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources