Evo CRM MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Evo CRM MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely access and manage CRM pipeline, relationships, tasks, notes, files, and deal context through authenticated Streamable HTTP/OAuth, inheriting the signed-in user's permissions and business-unit isolation.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to operate a CRM through 114 typed tools across 24 modules, covering contacts, pipelines, calendars, messaging, invoicing, and payments. Destructive and outward-facing actions are annotated for visibility and approval.114MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with a CRM covering companies, people, leads, deals, and more, with role checks, scoped agent keys, approval gates, and a shared audit trail.AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with CRM contacts, companies, activity, and conversations, and to perform semantic search across previously retrieved data.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and write leads, contacts, companies, tasks, notes, pipelines, tags, custom fields, users, events, conversations, and catalogs in the conversation-first sales CRM through its official v4 API, including a raw API call tool for any endpoint.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access and manage CRM data by creating contacts and companies, retrieving activities and conversations, and performing semantic search over previously retrieved information with built-in vector storage and caching.-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by resource and action: list, search, and get operations target contacts, inboxes, agents, conversations, messages, pipelines, pipeline items, and tasks. The main overlap is between pipeline_get, which can return pipeline items, and pipeline_items_list, though the descriptions clarify the distinction.
Tools consistently use snake_case resource_action naming such as contacts_list, conversations_list, pipeline_get, and tasks_list. There are minor singular/plural deviations (contacts_list/search vs contact_get, pipelines_list vs pipeline_get), but the overall convention is predictable.
Twelve tools is well within the appropriate range for a CRM server and each tool maps to a recognizable read operation. The set is not bloated, though it is notably read-only.
The surface covers many list/get/search operations but lacks any create, update, or delete tools for contacts, conversations, pipeline items, or tasks. For a CRM, this is a significant gap because agents cannot perform common write workflows.