Дочерние страницы

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention pagination, ordering, whether children are direct or recursive, what happens if the page has no children, or response format. This lack of detail makes it less transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded but lacks structural elements like bullet points or sections. It is efficient but could be slightly more informative without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the return value looks like, whether it is a list of page objects with specific fields, or how to handle pagination. A more complete description would include details like 'Returns a list of child page objects with id, title, and status' or 'Supports pagination via limit parameter'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (only 'id' has a description). The description does not add any parameter-level details beyond what the schema provides. For the 'limit' parameter, there is no description in schema or description text, so the agent cannot infer semantics or constraints beyond the schema's min/max/default.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns child pages for a given page. The verb 'возвращает' (returns) and resource 'дочерние страницы' (child pages) are specific. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from siblings like 'confluence_get_page' which returns a single page, but the purpose is clear enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: use this when you need child pages of a specific page. No explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives provided. The sibling tools list is available but not referenced in the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.