Meridian Commercial Intelligence MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_segment_attainmentA | Q1 2026 closed-won attainment vs. quota for one segment. |
| get_reps_at_riskA | Reps whose Q1 2026 closed-won attainment is below |
| get_pipeline_valueA | Sum of open-stage deal_value, optionally filtered. |
| get_deal_reasonA | The stored loss_reason for one account, verbatim. Refuses if empty. |
| list_supported_questionsB | The governed capability set — what this system can and can't answer. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool addresses a distinct commercial intelligence query: segment attainment, at-risk reps, pipeline value, deal loss reason, and capability listing. There is no overlap in purpose, making selection unambiguous.
The majority of tools follow a 'get_' + object pattern (get_segment_attainment, get_reps_at_risk, get_pipeline_value, get_deal_reason), but 'list_supported_questions' deviates by using 'list_' instead. Minor inconsistency, otherwise predictable.
Five tools is well-scoped for a commercial intelligence server. Each tool covers a distinct capability without bloat, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The coverage includes key metrics (attainment, risk, pipeline, loss reasons) and a self-describing capability list. However, some common queries like win rate or quota details are absent, presenting minor gaps that agents may need to work around.