Anumana
Related Servers
Alternatives to Anumana
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnforces safety and governance for SQL queries executed by AI agents, providing read-only enforcement, cost estimation, and audit trails.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to perform deterministic database architecture audits and performance engineering for PostgreSQL and MySQL, covering migration analysis with schema health scoring, ESR-based composite index recommendations, N+1 query detection, EXPLAIN plan diagnosis, transaction and deadlock analysis, partitioning and archival design, and capacity or configuration tuning. It also generates phased Expand & Contract runbooks that turn blocking DDL into zero-downtime production migrations.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to format SQL, explain queries in plain English, analyze schemas, build queries from natural language, and generate migrations, all without requiring a database connection.537 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to pre-flight estimate query costs, enforce hard budgets, reconcile actual billed spend, and suggest cheaper rewrites across BigQuery, Snowflake, and Databricks.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to validate, explain, and gate SQL statements against a supplied schema before execution, returning safe/review/blocked verdicts, issue codes, and fix suggestions. It acts as a pre-execution go/no-go guard and composes with database access servers.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLets AI agents estimate the cost and result size of BigQuery and Snowflake queries before they run, then execute them only within per-call byte, row, and dollar bounds. Estimates are labeled with an accuracy tier so agents never over-trust an approximate figure.461 PyPI1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
The set has a dense cluster around cost-checking a query: preflight_query, suggest_query, and rewrite_query all assess/verify query cost and rewrite behavior, making it non-obvious which to call first (descriptions do disambiguate via the generate->check->refine framing). The preflight_* trio is well-separated by scope (SQL vs vector vs offline DDL), and explain_query_working is distinct as a teaching tool.
Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (list_targets, list_policies, rewrite_query, suggest_query) and the preflight_* prefix is consistent. However, describe_schema_tool adds a redundant '_tool' suffix and explain_query_working ends in '_working', breaking the pattern in two places.
Nine tools is well-scoped for a query cost-analysis/enforcement server, with each tool covering a recognizably distinct surface (targets, policies, three preflight variants, rewrite, explanation, schema, grading). No bloat or thinness.
The domain (analyze/grade/rewrite queries without executing them) is covered end-to-end: discover targets, inspect schema, learn policies, preflight SQL/vector/offline, rewrite, and explain. Minor gaps exist, e.g. no explicit connectivity/health probe or standalone equivalence-verification tool, but core workflows are complete.