A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceConnects AI agents to Bitcoin payment rails with owner-defined spending policies and limits.
26
29 npm
MIT
Lightning Memory
Related Servers
Alternatives to Lightning Memory
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePay-per-use semantic memory for AI agents with cryptographic attestation. Vector embeddings with SHA256 commitment, secp256k1 signature, and Lightning invoice.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides a trust layer for AI agents with identity, reputation, payments, and discovery via 92 API endpoints as MCP tools, leveraging Nostr-native infrastructure.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform Bitcoin and Lightning Network payments using a non-custodial, zero-trust architecture. It provides 13 tools for wallet management, invoice creation, and payment processing while keeping node credentials local to the user's machine.139 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server exposing a Lightning wallet to LLM agents over Nostr Wallet Connect (NIP-47): balance, invoices, LN address/LNURL payments, batch pay, and keysend. All spend tools are wrapped in a defense-in-depth safety stack — budget caps, allowlist, two-step confirmation, audit log.1326 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first, encrypted memory for AI agents, with cryptographic forgetting.1,067 PyPI3Apache 2.0
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 22 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes. There is some overlap like ln_vendor_reputation vs ln_vendor_trust, but descriptions clarify differences. The ln_preflight tool bundles multiple checks but is clearly described as a composite.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'ln_' prefix for Lightning-related and 'memory_' for memory operations. Verbs are consistent and all snake_case.
Tool Count3/5
22 tools is on the higher side for a single server. While each tool has a clear role, some could potentially be combined (e.g., multiple budget tools). The count feels slightly bloated for the domain.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers memory CRUD, budget, compliance, vendor reputation, and remote queries. Minor gaps exist: no memory delete, no revoke attestation, but overall coverage is solid.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues