summarize_frontpage

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It indicates the tool summarizes (non-destructive) and optionally uses comments, but lacks details on side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or the nature of the returned data beyond a dictionary.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is relatively concise (three sentences) but contains typos ('Dictinory', 'informations'). The structure mixes purpose and parameter info, and the output description could be more formal. It earns its place but could be polished.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description explains the return value shape. However, it lacks error handling, performance expectations, or guidance on when to use limit effectively. Sibling tools are listed but not compared, leaving some gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description adds necessary meaning: limit controls number of posts (default 10), with_comments enables comment-based summary (default false). This clarifies parameters beyond the bare schema, though it could specify ranges or effects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool summarizes the user's frontpage (alias: homepage, feed), using specific verbs and resources. It distinguishes from sibling tools like summarize_subreddit and reed_comments by targeting the frontpage, though it could explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description mentions optional use of comments for deeper summaries, implying context for when to enable with_comments. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings (e.g., when not to use summarize_subreddit) or provide usage prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.