create_sprint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses guarded nature requiring confirmation, which is not fully covered by annotations (idempotentHint false, destructiveHint false). Also notes prerequisite 'Requires Jira Software'. Adds relevant context beyond structured metadata.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences with no filler. Front-loaded with purpose, then key behavior (guarded) and prerequisite. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters (2 required) and no output schema, the description covers purpose, guarding, and dependency. Lacks return value description, but schema descriptions for parameters are good. Reasonably complete for a simple creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The tool description adds no additional parameter-specific meaning beyond what's already in the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Creates a sprint on a scrum board' with specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from siblings like create_board, create_story by specifying sprint creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions 'requires confirm:true' which guides usage, but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or comparison with alternative tools. Could be improved with scenarios where other creation tools are preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.