Scored across 14 tools
Tools are cleanly partitioned by valuation subdomain (discount rates, cost/market/income approaches, asset types, PPA, impairment, simulation), and every description explicitly states when to prefer another tool. The only overlap is between valuation_income_methods and the asset-specific tools (valuation_ip, valuation_technology, valuation_customer), which the descriptions acknowledge and guide around, so boundaries are mostly distinct but require careful reading.
All 14 tools use a single predictable snake_case convention with the uniform valuation_ prefix followed by a domain noun. There is no mixing of camelCase, verb styles, or naming schemes.
14 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool groups a coherent family of methods (e.g. all income-approach formulas together, all rate construction together). No tool feels redundant or missing at the set level, and the method-parameter pattern keeps the surface compact.
The surface covers the full intangible-valuation lifecycle: discount-rate construction, time value, cost, market, and income approaches, asset-specific valuations (IP, technology, customer, human capital), royalty analysis, transfer-pricing/litigation, PPA/goodwill, impairment, and uncertainty simulation. There are no obvious dead ends for the stated domain.