kwork-mcp

Детали заказа Kwork

get_order_details

Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch the complete details, stages, and tracks for a Kwork order by order_id without truncation. Use it to inspect full order structure in your MCP workflow.

Instructions

Получить полную структуру details/stages/tracks заказа без обрезки.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`order_id`	Yes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Default
`data`	No
`meta`	Yes
`error`	No
`summary`	Yes
`schema_version`	No	1.0
`knowledge_state`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed12 schema fields changedv0.2.3Oct 3, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / order_id / exclusiveMinimum
```
Added value: +0
```
addedOutput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```

addedOutput schema / properties / data

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "properties": {
+        "raw": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "additionalProperties": {},
+              "type": "object"
+            },
+            {
+              "items": {},
+              "type": "array"
+            }
+          ],
+          "title": "Raw"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "raw"
+      ],
+      "title": "RawObjectData",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / error

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "properties": {
+        "code": {
+          "enum": [
+            "auth_required",
+            "auth_expired",
+            "auth_in_progress",
+            "account_binding_required",
+            "account_mismatch",
+            "captcha",
+            "permission",
+            "ip_blocked",
+            "csrf",
+            "rate_limit",
+            "circuit_open",
+            "proxy",
+            "timeout",
+            "closed_project",
+            "duplicate",
+            "insufficient_connects",
+            "contract_drift",
+            "credential_update_unknown",
+            "ambiguous_write",
+            "idempotency_conflict",
+            "preparation_expired",
+            "invalid_confirmation",
+            "write_in_progress",
+            "write_disabled",
+            "not_found",
+            "validation",
+            "site_unsupported",
+            "site_mismatch",
+            "upstream_unavailable",
+            "internal"
+          ],
+          "title": "ErrorCode",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "correlation_id": {
+          "title": "Correlation Id",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "message": {
+          "title": "Message",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "reconciliation_required": {
+          "default": false,
+          "title": "Reconciliation Required",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        "related_write_id": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ],
+          "default": null,
+          "description": "Unresolved write that blocks this operation; reconcile it first.",
+          "title": "Related Write Id"
+        },
+        "retry_after_seconds": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "number"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ],
+          "default": null,
+          "title": "Retry After Seconds"
+        },
+        "retryable": {
+          "default": false,
+          "title": "Retryable",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        "safe_to_retry": {
+          "default": false,
+          "title": "Safe To Retry",
+          "type": "boolean"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "code",
+        "message",
+        "correlation_id"
+      ],
+      "title": "ErrorInfo",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / knowledge_state

Added value: +{
+  "enum": [
+    "known_data",
+    "known_empty",
+    "unknown_error"
+  ],
+  "title": "KnowledgeState",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / meta

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "content_trust": {
+      "const": "external_untrusted",
+      "default": "external_untrusted",
+      "title": "Content Trust",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "correlation_id": {
+      "title": "Correlation Id",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "observed_at": {
+      "format": "date-time",
+      "title": "Observed At",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "const": "kwork",
+      "default": "kwork",
+      "title": "Source",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "upstream_contract": {
+      "const": "kwork==0.2.0",
+      "default": "kwork==0.2.0",
+      "title": "Upstream Contract",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "observed_at",
+    "correlation_id"
+  ],
+  "title": "ResultMeta",
+  "type": "object"
+}

removedOutput schema / properties / result

Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}

addedOutput schema / properties / schema_version

Added value: +{
+  "const": "1.0",
+  "default": "1.0",
+  "title": "Schema Version",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / summary

Added value: +{
+  "title": "Summary",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "result"
-]New value: +[
+  "knowledge_state",
+  "summary",
+  "meta"
+]

addedOutput schema / title

Added value: +"ResultEnvelope[RawObjectData]"

removedOutput schema / x-fastmcp-wrap-result
```
Removed value: -true
```

First observedv0.2.2Jun 23, 2026

TDQS

B3/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds one genuinely useful behavioral fact beyond the annotations: the result is returned in full without truncation. It says nothing about auth requirements, rate limits, or error behavior, so a 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single compact sentence with the core action and the no-truncation guarantee front-loaded. Nothing is redundant, though the brevity contributes to the documentation gaps noted elsewhere.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the description's mention of details/stages/tracks orients the agent. However, for a lookup tool the undocumented required parameter and the absence of any usage context leave the definition only minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the single parameter order_id carries no description in either the schema or the description. The description does not compensate at all — it never mentions the identifier, its format, or its constraints (positive integer).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb (get) and resource (order), and enumerates the payload sections returned (details/stages/tracks) plus the 'without truncation' qualifier. This is clearly distinguishable from get_kwork_details (kwork vs order) and list_worker_orders (list vs full detail). It stops short of explicitly naming a sibling, so it lands at 4.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no named alternative. The phrase 'без обрезки' faintly implies a contrast with a truncated variant, but the agent is left to infer when this tool should be chosen over list_worker_orders or get_kwork_details.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.