Skip to main content
Glama
ibkr-risk-mcp

ibkr-risk-mcp

by simoneb

Related Servers

Alternatives to ibkr-risk-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Portfolio risk analytics MCP server — VaR, Monte Carlo simulation, stress testing, portfolio optimization, options Greeks, and correlation analysis. Real market data via Yahoo Finance. Free tier available, Pro at $29/mo.
      10
      94 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Interactive Brokers that exposes portfolio data, market quotes, trading, and analysis to any MCP-compatible AI client, with support for EU investors and safety-gated trading.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP tools for Interactive Brokers: account, portfolio, market data, risk analysis and position sizing. Requires IBKR Pro and a local TWS or IB Gateway API session. Install the signed Canary binary or Claude Desktop MCPB bundle locally. Other local MCP clients launch the installed canary executable with the argument mcp. Setup: https://osauer.dev/canary/docs/start/install.html
      11
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server providing portfolio analytics tools: beta to a benchmark, sector correlation, and FIFO trade matching with realized/unrealized P&L using Yahoo Finance prices.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that turns Interactive Brokers into a question-answering portfolio analyst.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Interactive Brokers via IB Gateway, enabling read access to account data and trading capabilities for paper accounts.
      11
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three stress_* tools and two what-if tools live in the same conceptual neighborhood, so an agent must read carefully to pick between stress_portfolio, stress_curve, stress_whatif, and whatif_order. That said, each has a clearly distinct purpose—underlying-shock P&L, multi-volatility curves, hypothetical-leg P&L, and IB margin impact—and the descriptions draw those boundaries well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    snake_case verb_noun names are the dominant pattern (check_connection, get_margin_summary, stress_portfolio, calibrate_vol_coord), but whatif_order breaks the verb convention and the stress_/get_/whatif_ prefixes are not uniformly aligned. Still, the names are predictable enough to group and search.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools cover the server's stated risk-analysis scope without redundancy: connection health, margin, greeks, vol surface, stress curves, what-if, and calibration. Each tool occupies a distinct function and none feel like filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The risk workflow is well covered: users can check connectivity, inspect margin and greeks, fetch vol surfaces, stress the book, add hypothetical legs, and estimate margin impact. Minor gaps remain—there is no direct non-option position listing and no way to stress an individual underlying without running the whole portfolio—but these are workarounds rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing