Skip to main content
Glama
simoncoombes

tradefloor

by simoncoombes
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to tradefloor

  • finance-mcp

    joohyukjung
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Personal finance MCP server providing loan simulation, budgeting, investment comparison, retirement planning, French tax optimization, and inflation calculation through natural language.
    6 npm
    MIT

Related Servers

  • Litmus

    Spectrexf
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that lets an AI agent backtest, risk-check, and audit trading strategies, determining if a strategy is overfit or actually works.
    MIT

  • Scorched

    willcassell
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that lets you talk to your AI trading assistant in plain English to research stocks, generate trade recommendations, manage a portfolio, and execute trades through natural language.
    MIT

  • FinClaw

    IlyasFardaouix
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that provides AI agents with financial tools including real-time quotes, backtesting, technical analysis, and multi-exchange data via a simple CLI interface.
    2
    MIT

  • quant-research-mcp

    FlawlessByte
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server exposing a registry of paper-backed quantitative trading methods plus a deterministic, no-LLM decision helper for reproducible trading research.
    13
    39 PyPI
    MIT

  • AkTools Pro MCP Server

    tchivs
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An enhanced MCP server that provides financial data and analysis tools for stocks, crypto, precious metals, and more, empowering AI agents with professional financial intelligence, including backtesting, ASCII charts, and simulated portfolios.
    58
    6
    MIT
Deploy Server
Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 19 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Despite many 'run' tools, the boundaries are explicitly drawn: evaluate_strategies (one seed) vs rank_strategies (many seeds, sign test) vs run_stress_scenario (shocked vs unshocked) vs start_job (only way to 252 days). explain vs explain_price_move are contrasted (roster-wide factors vs one name's draws), and the session family (step/state/fork/rewind/close) each has a distinct verb of effect. An agent can reliably pick the right tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Mostly a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (validate_strategy, evaluate_strategies, run_stress_scenario, build_universe, list_scenarios, check_job). The session tools use a noun_verb namespace (session_step, session_fork, session_rewind) while their brackets are verb_noun (open_session, close_session), and bare 'explain' breaks the pattern, but the deviations are minor and readable.

Tool Count4/5

19 tools is slightly heavy but each earns its place: 6 cover a full interactive session lifecycle, 3 cover strategy scoring at different fidelities, plus jobs, scenario/universe authoring, explanation, and read-only orientation tools. Nothing looks redundant enough to drop, though the surface is dense.

Completeness4/5

Coverage is strong: cheap validation, single- and multi-seed evaluation, stressed runs, causal explanation, background jobs for long horizons, envelope/realism checks, and full session control with forking/rewinding. Only marginal gaps (e.g. no consolidated cross-preset comparison or result export beyond jobs/session_state), which agents can work around.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive

Resources