create_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds value beyond annotations by explaining that the workspace is reversible, costs nothing initially, and the 30-day trial starts only on first publish. It also mentions the prerequisite for an account token. No contradiction with annotations (openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, destructiveHint=false).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no fluff. The first sentence states the primary purpose, and the second adds key behavioral traits. Every sentence serves a purpose, and the structure is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 params, no output schema), the description covers creation behavior, cost implications, prerequisites, and relationship to other tools. It could mention the expected output (e.g., workspace ID) but is otherwise complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so descriptions already exist for each parameter. The description adds extra context for the 'slug' parameter (automatic derivation and fallback) and mentions tag limits. This enriches the schema but does not compensate for missing coverage since coverage is complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and resource 'bolthub workspace (tenant) for selling APIs'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'connect_wallet' and 'connect_account' by noting they are separate steps, making the purpose specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on when to use: it is secret-free, reversible, and has cost implications only after publishing. It explicitly states the prerequisite 'Requires an account token (connect_account)' and separates steps. However, it does not explicitly exclude scenarios where the tool should not be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.