Skip to main content
Glama
signal-slot

mcp-codexreview

by signal-slot
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-codexreview

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • GitLab Review MCP

      lininn
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables code review operations on GitHub and GitLab, including fetching pull/merge requests, viewing diffs, adding comments, analyzing code quality, and creating merge requests directly from your MCP client.
      15
      8 npm
      4
      MIT

    • Co-dev review MCP

      MohamedAmineBoufares
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP-capable assistant to review GitLab merge requests, GitHub pull requests, and pre-push local branches against ticket requirements, domain rubrics, compiler/lint pre-passes, blast-radius analysis, and SonarQube findings, and to draft inline comments or follow-up tasks in the user's chosen language. Nothing reaches a remote host until a human approves the exact content in an interactive terminal.
      3
      MIT

    • repo-sdk-mcp

      mreedr
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes functions to get the current working directory and review git diffs before commit as MCP tools, leveraging Claude Code CLI for diff review.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: reviewing code, retrieving the diff, and listing changed files. There is no overlap that would confuse an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: review_changes, get_diff, get_changed_files. The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a code review server, covering the essential workflow without unnecessary bloat. Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides a complete workflow: identify changed files, retrieve the diff, and review the changes. No critical operations are missing for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources