Skip to main content
Glama
siddiquesahabaj

CoordMCP

by siddiquesahabaj
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CoordMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • chatroom-mcp

      WarrenSchultz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A coordination server for Claude Code agents that provides a shared chat room and task board with atomic ownership, enabling seamless collaboration across machines.
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP Agent Mail

      OmelchMichael
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A coordination layer for coding agents that provides identities, message threading, and searchable history. It features file reservation leases to prevent agents from overwriting each other's work in multi-agent environments.
      1
      MIT

    • connectr

      JrKrishh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Coordinates multiple AI coding agents by providing a shared task board, memory, and advisory file claims, letting agents work on the same repo concurrently without duplicating work or overwriting each other.
      15 npm
      1
      MIT

    • lockstep-mcp

      Tmmoore286
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents like Claude and Codex to coordinate on the same project through shared tasks, file locks, and a real-time dashboard, preventing conflicts and streamlining collaborative development.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 52 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools overlap in purpose, such as get_project_info and get_project both retrieving project details, and get_agents_list vs get_active_agents listing agents. The distinction between some tools like get_project_dashboard and get_project_info is unclear, making it hard for an agent to pick the right one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_project, save_decision, lock_files). However, a few tools break the pattern with a '_tool' suffix (get_workflow_guidance_tool, get_system_prompt_tool), which is inconsistent.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 52 tools, the server is over-scoped for a coordination/memory system. The high count likely causes bloat and confusion; many tools could be consolidated or removed. The typical range for a well-designed server is 3-15 tools, and this vastly exceeds that.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers a broad range of multi-agent coordination needs: projects, agents, tasks, decisions, changes, file locking, and architecture. However, there are gaps like no update/delete for projects, decisions, or messages, and no way to edit a task's description. Some workflows are complete, but others are one-way.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources