SidClaw GovernanceMCPServer
Related Servers
Alternatives to SidClaw GovernanceMCPServer
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides a governance proxy layer for MCP servers, enforcing per-tool allowlists, human approval for write operations, quotas, secret redaction, and a hash-chained audit log of all calls.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceActs as a gating proxy for MCP servers, merging tools and applying policy, verification, and audit layers.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a governance layer for MCP servers, enforcing policy-based allow/deny/approval rules, requiring human approval for risky calls, and recording an auditable trail of every AI agent tool call.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA fail-closed policy boundary that translates local stdio MCP clients to authenticated Streamable HTTP servers, enforcing allowlists or read-only modes and redacting credentials from audit trails.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA least-privilege enforcement proxy for MCP servers. It sits between MCP clients and upstream servers, enforcing tool policies, hiding denied tools, requiring human approval for risky actions, and providing a structured audit trail.MIT

Agentomy MCP Gatewayofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGoverns any stdio MCP server by interposing between the agent and the server, enforcing policy on every tools/call and refusing denied actions before they reach the upstream server.13 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool available, there is zero risk of an agent confusing it with another tool or selecting the wrong one. The tool's purpose as a proxy wrapper is distinct by default.
The single tool uses clear snake_case formatting (governance_proxy). With only one tool in the set, it is trivially consistent with itself and follows a readable noun_noun pattern.
One tool is borderline thin for a 'Governance' server, which typically implies multiple concerns (policy management, audit review, configuration). While the proxy mechanism is functional, the surface feels minimal for the stated scope.
Major gaps exist for the governance domain: there are no tools to configure policies, retrieve audit trails, check approval queue status, or manage the governance lifecycle. The server only provides the proxy wrapper without exposing its own governance data or settings to agents.