List album tracks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only the notion of paging, which is already implied by the limit/offset schema fields, and says nothing about defaults, ordering, or maximum paging depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundancy. It is efficient, though its brevity reflects under-specification rather than disciplined editing, which is penalized in the other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described. However, for a paginated read tool the description never clarifies pagination semantics or the sparse_album flag, and it gives no basis for choosing it over tidal_get_album_items.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across four parameters, so the description must compensate and does not. album_id, limit and offset are self-explanatory, but sparse_album is entirely opaque and is documented in neither the schema nor the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action and resource: paging through audio tracks belonging to one album. The word 'audio' implicitly separates it from tidal_get_album_video, but it does not distinguish it from the very similar sibling tidal_get_album_items or explain what 'page through' means beyond the pagination params.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance and no mention of alternatives such as tidal_get_album_items or tidal_get_track. An agent must infer from the name alone that this is the tool for listing an album's track list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.