speedtest-tracker
Related Servers
Alternatives to speedtest-tracker
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying self-hosted coding-time analytics through summaries, project and leaderboard data, heartbeat records, user metadata, and health/badge endpoints, with optional guarded heartbeat writes and CSV output.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceServes read-only archived ResMed CPAP data from a local SQLite database, enabling MCP clients to query nightly summaries, raw signals, and sync status over the LAN.537 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA self-hostable PostgreSQL MCP server for exploring database schemas and running guarded read/write queries with selectable access modes (readonly, readwrite, admin), plus a dry-run confirm workflow for safety.141MIT
- AlicenseDqualityBmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that provides safe, governed read-only SQL access to SQLite and PostgreSQL, with validation, limits, task tracking, and report generation.20MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides read-only access to PostgreSQL databases with schema inspection, query execution in multiple formats (JSON, CSV, Markdown), and query history tracking with built-in security features.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for SQL databases (SQL Server, Postgres, SQLite) with multi-server support and three-layer safety using AST validation and linting.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools are grouped by clear resource areas: meta, results, servers, and stats. The main ambiguity is that both meta and results expose a 'latest' action, and the meta description does not clarify what 'latest' means, which could cause misselection.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with the same speedtest_tracker_ prefix and a resource group suffix. This makes the set predictable and easy to scan.
Four tools is a compact and appropriate surface for a speedtest tracker, with each tool representing a coherent resource group. Bundling multiple actions inside each tool keeps the count low without collapsing unrelated domains.
The surface covers read-oriented monitoring: health, latest results, result listing/getting, server listing, and aggregated stats. However, it lacks important lifecycle operations such as triggering a speedtest, deleting or managing results, and creating/updating servers, which may limit common tracker workflows.