Skip to main content
Glama

solidtime_members_list

Read-only

Lists members of a Solidtime organization, optionally by organization UUID or fallback membership, so you can identify users in that organization.

Instructions

List organization members. GET /api/v1/organizations/{organization}/members.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "solidtime_members_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
organization_idNoOrganization UUID. Falls back to SOLIDTIME_ORGANIZATION_ID, then a single membership from GET /v1/users/me/memberships.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is fully covered upstream. Beyond that, the description only appends the raw HTTP path, which adds little; it says nothing about result size, pagination, or ordering for what could be a large member list.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with the purpose front-loaded and no wasted clauses. The trailing HTTP route is the only piece of marginal value, but it does not bloat the definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple one-parameter read with annotations and full schema coverage, and there is no output schema, so the description's brevity is defensible. However, it gives no hint of what a member record contains, and the missing usage guidance against overlapping siblings leaves a real gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the single organization_id parameter is documented thoroughly in the schema, including the environment-variable and memberships fallback chain. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('List organization members'), which distinctively separates it from sibling mutators like solidtime_member_update, solidtime_member_remove, and solidtime_member_invite_placeholder. It does not explicitly name an alternative, but the purpose is unambiguous on its own.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance at all — no mention of how this differs from solidtime_memberships or solidtime_organization_get, both of which plausibly overlap. The agent is left to infer the selection criteria entirely from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.