Unsuspend service

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a non-read-only, non-destructive action. The description adds the behavioral detail that the module is also reactivated when `use_module` is true, but does not disclose edge cases like error conditions or behavior when the service is already active.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence with a clear front-loaded action. The `use_module` clarification earns its place, while 'Wraps Services.unsuspend' is slightly redundant but not harmful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one required parameter and annotations covering safety, the description covers the core purpose but lacks guidance on when to use it versus siblings and does not address potential failure modes or return expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33% (staff_id), leaving service_id and use_module undocumented. The description clarifies `use_module` by explaining its effect, but does not add meaning for service_id or staff_id beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Reactivate') and resource ('a suspended service'), and the note about `use_module` clarifies scope. This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling inverse tool `suspend_service`.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the verb and name, but there is no explicit guidance on when to choose this over `suspend_service` or other service-related tools. No prerequisites or exclusions are described.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.