listTunnels
Show all active SSH tunnels to track current remote connections.
Instructions
Lists all active SSH tunnels.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Show all active SSH tunnels to track current remote connections.
Lists all active SSH tunnels.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only says 'Lists all active SSH tunnels.' It does not disclose read-only nature, authentication needs, or scope (e.g., user-specific vs. all tunnels).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, front-loaded with important verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple list tool with no parameters and no output schema. However, does not explain what 'active' means or what information is returned, leaving some ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds nothing about parameters, but baseline for zero parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Lists') and the resource ('all active SSH tunnels'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'createTunnel' and 'closeTunnel'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'listActiveSessions' or 'listConnections'. No context for prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shuakami/mcp-ssh'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server