Skip to main content
Glama
shriramkv

mcp-mock-server

by shriramkv
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-mock-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-mock

      vibeglitch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight mock MCP server for local testing and resilience experiments, providing predictable tool responses with simulated latency and errors.
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-explorer

      ABeltramo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A controllable, observable MCP server for dynamically setting tools and intercepting calls in real time, useful as a mock/MITM harness for testing MCP clients.
      -

    • Mock MCP Server

      DiscreteTom
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A mock MCP server for testing MCP client implementations and development workflows. Supports tools, prompts, and resources across multiple transport protocols (stdio, HTTP, SSE).
      1
      MIT

    • mock-mcp

      it370
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A minimal local HTTP MCP mock server for development and testing, providing predictable tool responses with OAuth token support and zero dependencies.
      -

    • Echo MCP Server

      somacaru
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple demonstration MCP server that provides an echo tool and resource for learning how to build MCP servers. Serves as a starting point and template for creating custom MCP server implementations.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The purpose of echoing a message is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'echo' is clear and directly describes its function. With only one tool, naming consistency is trivially satisfied.

    Tool Count1/5

    The server provides only a single trivial echo tool, which is an extreme mismatch for any meaningful purpose. A server with one trivial tool earns a score of 1.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete; an echo tool alone provides no meaningful coverage of any domain. There are no additional operations to support a workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources