Claude-NWS Protocol Bridge
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_alertsA | |
| get_forecastC | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: get_alerts retrieves weather alerts for a US state, while get_forecast provides weather forecasts for a specific geographic location. There is no overlap in functionality or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (get_alerts and get_forecast), using the same verb 'get' followed by a descriptive noun. This makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a weather service domain. While the tools cover alerts and forecasts, there are likely missing operations such as current conditions, radar data, or historical data that would make the set more complete for typical weather-related tasks.
For a weather service, the tool set is significantly incomplete. It lacks core functionalities like getting current weather conditions, radar or satellite imagery, historical data, or air quality information. This limited coverage will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform comprehensive weather-related tasks.