get_editions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only discloses a limit cap of 40, but fails to mention pagination, ordering, behavior for invalid book_id, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a read tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no wasted words. First sentence states purpose, second adds usage context and a behavioral note. It is efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return values are covered. However, parameter coverage is incomplete, and behavioral details are sparse. For a list tool, pagination and error handling are missing, making it barely adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It describes the limit parameter's cap (40) but not the required book_id parameter. This adds some value but leaves the main parameter unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists published editions of a book, specifying formats, ISBNs, publishers, and dates. It distinguishes from siblings like get_book (which retrieves a single book) or search_books (which searches for books).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions it is useful for questions about 'which edition / format / ISBN,' providing clear context for when to use it. However, it lacks explicit when-not to use or alternatives, and does not cover exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.