list_feishu_bitable_dashboards

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description carries full burden. It discloses paginated behavior and output purpose, but lacks details on rate limits, error handling, or side effects. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single sentence, front-loaded with key action and output, no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description is brief for a paginated list tool with output schema. It lacks explanation of how block_id is used (e.g., for copying dashboards) and does not describe pagination mechanics. Sufficient for basic use but incomplete for first-time users.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67%, so baseline is 3. Description does not add meaning beyond schema for parameters; it only states output purpose without detailing parameter usage. Minimal added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (paginated query) and resource (Bitable dashboards), and specifies the output (block_id for copying templates). It distinguishes from sibling tools that operate on documents, fields, records, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites mentioned. Sibling tool 'copy_feishu_bitable_dashboard' likely uses the returned block_id, but this relationship is not stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.