mcp-svstudio
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-svstudio
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to generate, inspect, and micro-tune OpenUtau .ustx project files and DiffSinger neural expression curves.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceControls OpenUtau (vocal synthesis software) from Claude Desktop, enabling project creation, editing, and live note manipulation via a bridge plugin.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Synthesizer V AI Vocal Studio, which allows LLMs to create/edit vocal tracks e.g. adding lyrics to the melody.612Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to compose, tune, render, mix, and audit native VOCALOID3/4 projects from scratch, acting as a production bridge between intent and finished song.2214MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to create, edit, and manage AviUtl2 video projects, with optional real-time control via a native bridge plugin.19-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create, modify, and save LMMS music projects programmatically, including tracks, notes, mixer control, effects, and song settings.52MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Tools are generally organized by resource (notes, phonemes, voice, parameters, transport) and the descriptions clarify distinctions such as get_phonemes vs get_computed_phonemes and get_voice vs get_parameters. Minor overlap remains between get_project_info/get_server_status and between note attribute and phoneme tools, but selection should be reliable.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_notes, set_voice, list_tracks, batch_edit), with list_ reserved for collections and get_/set_ for individual properties. The transport controls (play, pause, stop, seek, loop) are bare verbs and batch_edit is a compound, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform but remains predictable.
26 tools is high but defensible for a Synthesizer V Studio integration that spans project status, note editing, phonemes, attributes, voice settings, automation curves, and transport. The count is at the upper edge of reasonable and every tool maps to a distinct operation rather than redundant duplicates.
The core note workflow is well covered: create/read/search/update/delete notes, phoneme handling, attribute editing, voice settings, parameter automation, and transport control. Missing group/track creation or rendering/export are notable gaps, but they appear outside the intended editing scope and can be worked around.