Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-svstudio

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate, inspect, and micro-tune OpenUtau .ustx project files and DiffSinger neural expression curves.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Controls OpenUtau (vocal synthesis software) from Claude Desktop, enabling project creation, editing, and live note manipulation via a bridge plugin.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to compose, tune, render, mix, and audit native VOCALOID3/4 projects from scratch, acting as a production bridge between intent and finished song.
      22
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, modify, and save LMMS music projects programmatically, including tracks, notes, mixer control, effects, and song settings.
      52
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are generally organized by resource (notes, phonemes, voice, parameters, transport) and the descriptions clarify distinctions such as get_phonemes vs get_computed_phonemes and get_voice vs get_parameters. Minor overlap remains between get_project_info/get_server_status and between note attribute and phoneme tools, but selection should be reliable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_notes, set_voice, list_tracks, batch_edit), with list_ reserved for collections and get_/set_ for individual properties. The transport controls (play, pause, stop, seek, loop) are bare verbs and batch_edit is a compound, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform but remains predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    26 tools is high but defensible for a Synthesizer V Studio integration that spans project status, note editing, phonemes, attributes, voice settings, automation curves, and transport. The count is at the upper edge of reasonable and every tool maps to a distinct operation rather than redundant duplicates.

    Completeness4/5

    The core note workflow is well covered: create/read/search/update/delete notes, phoneme handling, attribute editing, voice settings, parameter automation, and transport control. Missing group/track creation or rendering/export are notable gaps, but they appear outside the intended editing scope and can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues