Skip to main content
Glama
shlokkhemani

rabbithole

by shlokkhemani
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to rabbithole

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • corpus-rag

      monahand1023
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for local RAG over personal notes, PDFs, and documents, enabling plain-English querying and hybrid search with multi-hop context expansion.
      MIT

    • pdf-context

      mematcha
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that ingests PDFs, extracts structure, and provides semantic search and sequential navigation tools for AI clients to query and learn from documents.
      10
      MIT

    • minirag

      mck-s
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for a self-hosted RAG system that enables AI tools to search and retrieve grounded answers from locally ingested documents via MCP tools, with local embeddings and no API key required.
      MIT

    • Grounded Code MCP

      michaelalber
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that gives AI coding assistants retrieval access to your personal knowledge base of books, standards, and docs, grounding their answers in sources you trust.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context All Your Agents Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and hold it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: opening/resuming rabbitholes, answering branch requests, ingesting PDFs, and listing saved ones. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the `verb_noun` pattern (e.g., list_rabbitholes, open_rabbithole, answer_branch, ingest_pdf), providing a consistent and predictable interface.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the set is tightly scoped to the rabbithole interaction domain—opening, answering, ingesting, and listing. No tool feels redundant, and the number is appropriate for the focused purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core workflows well, but missing explicit update/delete functionality for rabbitholes. However, the blocking nature of open_rabbithole and the branch-answer loop cover most user interactions adequately.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources