recap-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to recap-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA remote MCP server that gives Claude (and ChatGPT/Gemini) persistent read/write access to your own memory: books, games, projects, notes, and freeform facts.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude Code cross-session memory persisted to a plain .claude-memory.md file in your repo.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePersistent memory MCP server for Claude Code that captures and recalls project context across sessions, eliminating the need to re-explain architecture and decisions daily.1,036 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude Code persistent, fully local long-term memory across conversations, with tools to query, log, consolidate, snapshot, and delete memories without any LLM calls.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for project planning inside Claude. It tracks progress, knows your codebase, and resumes exactly where you left off every session.12 npm5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server giving Claude persistent memory via entities, observations, history, and reminders, backed by a lightweight Node/SQLite backend.20 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: project, task, session, note, or search. Even session_log and quick_note are clearly separated by structured end-of-session entries vs. stray timestamped thoughts, so an agent should rarely mis-select.
Most tools follow a readable resource_action pattern: project_list, project_create, task_add, task_update, task_delete. A few outliers like briefing, quick_note, and search break that pattern, but the naming remains largely predictable and unambiguous.
Eleven tools is a well-scoped size for a workspace/project/task/session management domain. Each tool covers a meaningful operation without unnecessary overlap or bloat.
Task CRUD is complete, and search/project_brief provide solid retrieval. However, project lifecycle management is incomplete: projects can be created and listed but not updated, archived, or deleted, which is notable given archived and stale project statuses are referenced.