Skip to main content
Glama
shinjiyu

figma-meta-mcp

by shinjiyu

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
FIGMA_MCP_HOSTNoBridge bind host (:: = dual-stack so Windows localhost works)::
FIGMA_MCP_PORTNoBridge listen port3851
FIGMA_MCP_EXEC_TIMEOUT_MSNoPer-job timeout30000

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
figma_healthA

Check whether the local Figma bridge is up and whether the Development plugin is connected.

figma_execA

Execute JavaScript inside the running Figma plugin main thread (like ae_exec / cocosmcp_exec / Blender execute_blender_code). The code runs with access to the global figma Plugin API. Write an async body; the final expression / return value is JSON-serialized back. Prefer plain data (id/name/type/x/y/width/height). Avoid returning live node proxies. Example: return figma.currentPage.selection.map(n => ({ id: n.id, name: n.name, type: n.type }));

figma_selection_infoA

Summarize the current page and selection (id/name/type/bounds).

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The three tools serve clearly distinct functions: health check, arbitrary code execution, and selection introspection. There is no overlap in purpose, even though figma_selection_info could be replicated via figma_exec; it is presented as a convenience wrapper with a distinct scope.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names share the figma_ prefix, but the second part is not uniformly verb_noun. figma_health and figma_selection_info are noun phrases, while figma_exec is a verb. This is a minor inconsistency, but the pattern is still predictable and readable.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools is a small but reasonable set for a bridge server. The health and selection tools handle occasional meta needs, while figma_exec provides the core general-purpose capability. It is slightly on the lean side, but not insufficient.

Completeness5/5

figma_exec offers arbitrary access to the Figma Plugin API, making the tool surface effectively complete for any operation. The other two tools cover operational status and a common convenience need. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core workflows.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues