Skip to main content
Glama
shinerio

CodeGraph Multi-Repo MCP

by shinerio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to CodeGraph Multi-Repo MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • koragraph by Koragraph

      koragraphofficial

      Koragraph
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to query a local, multi-repo code graph for symbol exploration, blast radius analysis, co-change mining, and durable code-anchored memory via MCP tools.
      133 npm
      14
      Business Source 1.1

    • ACE-MCP

      0215AndrewFeng
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to perform local code search, indexing, and analysis across Java, JavaScript/TypeScript, .NET/C#, and Python projects through the MCP protocol.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • Code Context MCP

      foreversaga
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to index and search multi-project codebases through semantic and full-text retrieval, symbol lookup, and reference search via a local MCP endpoint.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing repos, exploring one repo, refreshing metadata, asking questions across repos, and tracing identifiers across repos. No overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., ask_multi_repo, explore_repo), maintaining perfect consistency across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for multi-repo CodeGraph exploration. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy or overload.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core operations: listing, exploring, querying, tracing, and refreshing. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking a tool to add/remove repositories or search within a single repo without full exploration, but these are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources