Skip to main content
Glama
shiguangzhe666

Fusion360 MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fusion360 MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD automation, enabling natural language control over sketching, 3D modeling, and CAM operations. It uses a Python-based bridge and a custom add-in to execute over 80 tools ranging from simple geometry creation to complex assembly and parameter management.
      80
      101
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect and automate Autodesk Fusion 360 through MCP, providing tools for CAD modeling, CAM manufacturing, and document management.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible assistants to control Autodesk Fusion for mechanical modeling, assembly editing, CAM workflows, inspection, and model export through Fusion's native MCP endpoint.
      39
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents genuine 3D spatial understanding of Autodesk Fusion 360, enabling exact measurements, collision analysis, and free-space placement search, plus Fusion-native parametric authoring for clean, human-editable models.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server for controlling Autodesk Fusion 360 from any AI agent, enabling 3D modeling operations via natural language.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 85 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., extrude vs revolve vs loft), but several CAM tools (cam_generate_toolpath, cam_post_process, cam_create_operation) and some feature tools (split_body vs split_face, create_bend vs create_flange) have subtle overlaps that could cause confusion without domain knowledge.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern. A few naming quirks exist (e.g., 'extrude' and 'fillet' as bare verbs, and the 'cam_' prefix for CAM tools), but these are minor deviations and not misleading.

    Tool Count1/5

    85 tools is excessive for a single MCP server, far exceeding the typical 3-15 range. While Fusion 360 is a broad domain, this count suggests poor scoping and will impose significant cognitive load on an agent.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers an impressively complete range of Fusion 360 workflows: sketching, solid modeling, surface modeling, sheet metal, CAM, assemblies, parameters, measurement, rendering, and export. CRUD operations for parameters and components are present, and the domain coverage is comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues