Selvageofficial
A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables AI-powered code review of Git diffs through natural language, supporting multiple AI models and Git workflows.
36
Apache 2.0
LGTMCP
by shields
Related Servers
Alternatives to LGTMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables automated GitHub Pull Request reviews using local Ollama, Cursor CLI, or Gemini CLI as AI providers. Supports customizable review prompts, comprehensive PR analysis, and optional auto-posting of reviews to GitHub.3 npm5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-powered, zero-trust code review with multiple models, supporting single files, git diffs, and multiple files, with security, performance, and architecture checks across 10+ languages.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI-assisted code review with bias mitigation strategies through cross-model evaluation and bias-aware prompting. Detects AI-generated code from commit authors and provides structured reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive code reviews using multiple AI models (O3, Gemini, Claude Opus) and consolidates results with GPT-4, focusing on bugs, security, performance, and best practices.1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying any GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repository and getting AI-generated answers about the codebase, powered by Gemini.5MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one reviews and commits if approved, while the other only reviews without committing. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow a consistent verb-based naming pattern (review_and_commit, review_only), using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and aligned with their functions.
Tool Count2/5
With only 2 tools, the server feels too thin for a code review and commit domain, lacking operations like listing reviews, updating commits, or handling rejections. This minimal set limits agent workflows.
Completeness2/5
The server covers basic review and commit actions but has significant gaps: no tools for managing or querying existing reviews/commits, no update or delete operations, and no error handling for edge cases, making the surface incomplete for robust code management.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues