Skip to main content
Glama
shielddns

ShieldDNS MCP server

Official
by shielddns

Related Servers

Alternatives to ShieldDNS MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check URL safety before fetching content, using Google Web Risk, URLhaus, PhishTank, and AI analysis to return SAFE/SUSPICIOUS/DANGEROUS verdicts.
      1
      11 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform cybersecurity analysis including RDAP lookup, DNS analysis, SSL inspection, security header detection, and more, returning structured security reports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect a URL before opening, following, or recommending it, by tracing redirect chains via headers, stripping tracking parameters, detecting phishing-style URL tricks, and cross-checking threat-intel feeds to return a SAFE, SUSPICIOUS, or DANGEROUS verdict with supporting evidence. It also scans text for embedded and defanged links and vets agent skills prior to installation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check a domain's email authentication and health across SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, MX, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT, returning a score and recommended fixes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.
      7
      33 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_domain and resolve are mostly distinct: one gives a safety verdict and advice, the other returns DNS records and resolution metadata. There is some overlap because resolve also reports threat blocking and DNSSEC status, so an agent may occasionally hesitate between them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The names mix conventions: check_domain is verb_noun, resolve is a bare verb, and service_status is noun_noun. They remain readable and understandable, but the set does not follow a predictable pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools fit the server's focused scope of domain safety checking, DNS resolution, and node status. The surface is small but each tool has a clear role, though it sits at the lower bound of a comfortable set.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: safety verdicts, raw DNS resolution with DNSSEC and blocking info, and node status. Minor gaps exist, such as no bulk domain check or blocklist/configuration inspection, but the main workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues