Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to QMYZ-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI clients to send and receive QQ messages through NapCatQQ (OneBot v11) for both private and group chats. It supports message context management, real-time WebSocket listening, and human-like typing simulation.
      7
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server that exposes QQ bot capabilities over Streamable HTTP, enabling clients to query bot status, read group and friend info, fetch chat history, and send group/private text messages.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools to interact with the LeetCode API, enabling problem fetching, code template generation, and solution execution/submission.
      7
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Chaoxing (学习通) that logs into a user's account and exposes their class schedule, enrolled courses, course materials downloads, homework status, exam schedules and scores, chapter task-point progress, notices, and personal cloud drive files. Enables any MCP client to answer natural-language questions about a student's coursework without submitting anything or modifying account data.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_courses retrieves course metadata, get_question fetches questions for a specific course, and submit_question submits answers to specific questions. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions clearly differentiate their roles in the workflow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (get_courses, get_question, submit_question). The naming is predictable and readable, making it easy for agents to understand the action each tool performs.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a course/quiz management domain. While the tools cover core operations, additional functionalities like updating courses or managing user sessions might be expected. However, the count is not critically low, just borderline minimal.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers a basic workflow: list courses, get questions, and submit answers. Minor gaps exist, such as no tools for creating or deleting courses, or handling user authentication beyond JSESSIONID. Agents can work around these, but the surface is not fully comprehensive for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive