Skip to main content
Glama
shen866

Vision Bridge MCP

by shen866
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Vision Bridge MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Luma MCP

      sChauhan9915
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A multi-model vision MCP server that gives image understanding to AI coding models lacking native vision, letting them analyze screenshots, error images, UIs, documents, and OCR content through a single unified tool. It supports several mainstream vision LLM providers plus any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, with automatic image cropping, compression, and retry handling.
      866 npm
      MIT

    • vision-mcp

      Peter-Lpt
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that provides vision capabilities to text-only models like Claude Code and Codex by forwarding images to an OpenAI-compatible multimodal model, offering tools for image analysis and OCR.
      -

    • vision-mcp

      nikkoxgonzales
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives Claude and other clients vision capabilities including screenshot-to-code, OCR, error diagnosis, diagram analysis, data-viz insights, UI diff checks, and video analysis via any OpenAI-compatible vision endpoint.
      7,021 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: ask_about_image answers specific questions, describe_image generates a detailed description, and extract_image_text performs OCR. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the verb_noun pattern with underscores, using clear and distinct verbs (ask, describe, extract). The naming is consistent throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    With three tools, the server is well-scoped for image understanding tasks. Each tool serves a clear function without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover key image understanding capabilities: description, OCR, and question answering. Minor gaps like image classification or segmentation exist, but the set is largely complete for its implied purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources