Skip to main content
Glama
shelendrajain2004

Financial Risk MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Financial Risk MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to perform zero-dependency quantitative finance and risk analytics through MCP, including Nelson-Siegel yield curve interpolation, option Greeks, Monte Carlo simulations, VaR/CVaR, and bond duration/convexity calculations. It supports natural-language financial modeling and hedging strategy generation in MCP-compatible clients.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to retrieve quantum-computed portfolio optimisation, VaR simulations, AI-enhanced sentiment and regime detection, and cross-asset risk signals through simple metric tools.
      44 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Equips AI agents with institutional risk management and execution tools for Solana and Hyperliquid, enabling Kelly-criterion position sizing, VaR/CVaR analysis, Monte Carlo simulations, circuit breaker checks, and wallet/funding data queries through standardized MCP tools.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run probabilistic portfolio analysis workflows, including input validation, instrument verification, simulation preparation, and approved interactive reporting.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables quantitative portfolio tail-risk analysis, option Greeks, Monte Carlo stochastic simulations, fixed-income duration/convexity, and Nelson-Siegel yield-curve interpolation through MCP tools.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables quantitative risk analysis by calculating portfolio Value-at-Risk and Conditional VaR/Expected Shortfall across parametric and historical loss distributions, along with related option Greeks, Monte Carlo simulations, and fixed-income analytics through MCP.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct risk metric: regulatory SA-CCR exposure, Monte Carlo PFE profiles, portfolio VaR/CVaR, and Greeks. The only mild overlap is between calculate_sacr_exposure and simulate_monte_carlo_pfe, since both address counterparty exposure, but the standardized-formula vs simulation distinction is clear enough to distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case with a verb_noun structure (calculate_sacr_exposure, simulate_monte_carlo_pfe, compute_portfolio_var, calculate_portfolio_greeks), which is easily predictable. The verb choices vary (calculate/simulate/compute) but all are equally readable and follow the same pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a focused, well-scoped set that avoids redundancy for a risk analytics server. It is on the lean side, but each tool clearly earns its place.

    Completeness3/5

    The core measures are covered: exposure, PFE, VaR/CVaR, and Greeks. However, notable counterparty-risk operations are absent, including CVA/credit valuation adjustment, stress testing, and scenario or backtesting tools, leaving some obvious gaps in a full risk workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues