Skip to main content
Glama
shaynemeyer

obsidian-mcp

by shaynemeyer

Related Servers

Alternatives to obsidian-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with Obsidian vaults, supporting intelligent search, note CRUD operations, backlink analysis, and advanced knowledge management tools like narrative path generation and note cluster detection.
      17
      3,358 npm
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to read, create, edit, delete, move, and search notes in local Obsidian vaults via direct filesystem access, including tag management and support for multiple vaults.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, write, search, and navigate Obsidian vault notes with support for CRUD operations, full-text search, graph navigation, daily notes, and frontmatter management.
      3,358 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading, writing, searching, and managing Obsidian vault notes via Model Context Protocol, including frontmatter queries, daily notes, and configurable vault access.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct resource and action: reading (read_note, get_active_note), discovery (list_notes, search_notes, list_tags), writing (write_note, append_to_note, patch_note), and vault administration (list_vaults, switch_vault, backend_status). Overlapping write tools are clearly differentiated by insertion point and cross-reference each other.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow the obsidian_verb_noun pattern (list_notes, read_note, write_note, delete_note, run_command). Only obsidian_backend_status deviates by using a noun-noun name instead of a verb such as get_status or get_backend_status.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but each tool earns its place covering vaults, notes, search, commands, and status. The granularity between append, patch, and append_to_daily_note is justified by real workflow differences.

    Completeness4/5

    Note CRUD is fully covered (create via write, read, update via write/append/patch, move, delete), plus discovery, search, tag listing, vault management, and Obsidian command execution. Minor gaps exist—such as no restore-from-trash tool and no explicit folder creation—but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues