snapshot_org

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that it returns only summary statistics and never permission rows, and explains the scope default. However, it lacks details on other behaviors such as whether the snapshot store is overwritten or appended, authentication requirements, or rate limits, which are not covered by annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with two sentences: the first states the purpose, and the second clarifies the scope behavior. No unnecessary words, and key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (bulk-fetch with potential impact), the description is adequate but could be more complete. It does not mention return value details (output schema exists but is not described) or behavior regarding existing snapshots, but it covers the main purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaningful context for the scope parameter (defaults and format) beyond the schema. The org_alias parameter is not further explained, so not all parameters are fully clarified, but the main parameter benefits.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool bulk-fetches permission architecture into a snapshot store, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings by noting it returns only summary statistics, not permission rows, but does not explicitly name sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides guidance on the scope parameter default and how to include Apex, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus sibling tools like permission_diff or list_snapshots. Usage context is implied but not fully delineated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.