Skip to main content
Glama
shashicandev

gingr-mcp

by shashicandev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to gingr-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MSSQL-MCP

      esasiyun17
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Security-first, read-only MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server, enabling safe natural-language querying of databases.
      5
      13 npm
      MIT

    • MCP PostgreSQL

      cuevacelis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for PostgreSQL that enables safe database introspection and querying via natural language.
      551 npm
      MIT

    • Pet Grooming Analytics MCP

      Bert305
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that connects to a pet-grooming database, exposing secure analytics tools for customers, pets, appointments, services, and payments.
      MIT

    • text-to-sql-mcp

      HamzaOuadid
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that translates natural-language questions into SQL, validates every query structurally, and executes approved read-only queries against a SQLite database, returning results and rejections.
      MIT

    • database-mcp

      KaushalKishorMishra
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only Text-to-SQL MCP server for PostgreSQL and MySQL that lets users query databases using natural language, with robust multi-layer safety guarantees against writes.
      15 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All seven tools have clearly distinct purposes: owners, animals, appointments (filtered by category), employees, owners, reservations (boarding/daycare), and services. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent 'gingr_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., list_animals, get_owner_reservations). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a pet facility management server. Each tool covers a core entity (owners, animals, employees, services, reservations in two flavors) without being excessive or minimal.

    Completeness4/5

    The server is read-only but covers the main entities needed for analysis. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no get_animal_by_id, no filtering by date for appointments), but overall it provides a solid analytical surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources