analyze_keyword

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that results are 'simulated', which is critical for understanding tool limitations. Describes return fields comprehensively. No annotations provided, so description carries full burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose, no redundant words. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given simplicity of tool (1 param, no output schema, no nested objects), description adequately explains input and output. Could be enhanced with example or note on simulation accuracy.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter, and the description adds no significant meaning beyond the schema's 'The keyword to analyze'. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Analyze', resource 'SERP data', and specifies output ('simulated top 10 results with word counts, heading counts, common topics, and SERP features'). Distinguishes from sibling tools like check_readability and find_missing_topics.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for keyword analysis but lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives or when not to use. No mention of conditions or constraints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.